Forensic Medicine Research Output: A Bibliometric Analysis

R. Jayapriya; P. Sivaraman

doi:10.51983/ajist-2012.2.2.2587

Authors

R. Jayapriya Directorate of Distance Education, Library and Information Science Wing, Annamalai University, Annamalainagar - 608 002, Tamil Nadu, India
P. Sivaraman Directorate of Distance Education, Library and Information Science Wing, Annamalai University, Annamalainagar - 608 002, Tamil Nadu, India

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.51983/ajist-2012.2.2.2587

Keywords:

Bibliometrics, Forensic Medicine, Legal Medicine, Legal Pathology, Medical Jurisprudence

Abstract

This article focuses on the research output and growth of research on Forensic Medicine literature during 1981-2011. The data have been downloaded from the online published database of MEDLINE bibliographic format. The findings conclude that collaborative performance of authors compete single author contribution and the United States contribution is higher when compared to other countries contribution. The maximum outputs are articles published in journals.

References

Pekka Saukko and Frank Mußhoff, „Tasks of research in forensic medicine – different study types in clinical research and forensic medicine”, Forensic Science International, Vol. 165, No. 2 , Pages 92- 97, 2007.

K.B. Nolte, “Research issues in forensic pathology: a survey of academic institutions employing forensic pathologists”, Human Pathology, Vol. 35, No.5, pp. 532-535, 2004.

http://yunus.hacettepe.edu.tr/~umutal/publications/collnet2011- istanbul.pdf. Accessed on 28.12.2011

http://www.pinnicle.com/Articles/Pareto_Principle/pareto_principle. html