Indian Doctoral Researches in Neuroscience: A Scientometric Study

Authors

  • R. G. Sreeragi Research Scholar, Department of Library and Information Science, University of Kerala, Thiruvananthapuram, Kerala, India
  • B. Mini Devi Head & Assistant Professor, Department of Library and Information Science, University of Kerala, Thiruvananthapuram, Kerala, India

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.51983/ajist-2018.8.3.191

Keywords:

Shodhganga, Neuroscience, States, Universities, Guides, Subjects, Departments

Abstract

Neuroscience is a mix up of research outputs emanated from various disciplines like medicine, biotechnology, biochemistry, psychology, pharmacology, computer science, linguistics etc. Even experts in management also started thinking about the underlying neurological facts behind successful decision making in business and Management. This paper explains the contribution of universities towards Indian neuroscience in the form of theses. Here we can see the interdisciplinary contribution to the field. The source of data was “Shodhganga” maintained by Information and Library Network (INFLIBNET) Centre. The initiatives of different states, universities and guides are given detailed. The subjects in which active research is going on in Indian universities are identified. The findings of the study are useful for those who keenly examine India’s productivity on neuroscience.

References

Amudha, S., & Sevukan, R. (2014). Indian Neuroscience Research, 1999-2013: A scientometric analysis. Collnet Journal of Scientometrics and Information Management, 8(2), 329.

Bala, Adarsh, & Gupta, B. M. (2010). Mapping of Indian neuroscience research: A scientometric analysis of research output during 1999-2008. Neurology India, 58, 35-41.

Butler, M. J. R., & Senior, C. (2007). Towards an organisational cognitive neurosciences. Ann. N.Y. Acad. Sci., 11(18), 1-17. doi:10.1196/annals.1412.009.

Chopra, R. N., et al. (1958). Chopra’s indigenous drugs of India. Academic Publishers, 2nd ed, Kolkata, ISBN:81-85086-80.

Concise Oxford English Dictionary. (2011). 12th ed. Oxford University Press, United Kingdom.

Gupta, B. M., & Bala, Adarsh. (2011, January-June). A scientometric analysis of Indian research output in medicine during 1999–2008. Journal of Natural Science, Biology and Medicine, 2(1), 87-100.

New concise medical dictionary. (2006). 4th ed. AITBS Publishers and distributors, New Delhi.

Prabhakaran, D., & Yusuf, S. (2010). Cardiovascular disease in India: Lessons learnt & challenges ahead. Indian Journal of Medical Research, 132(11), 529-530.

Schwechheimer, H., & Winterhager, M. (2001). Mapping interdisciplinary research fronts In neuroscience: A Bibliometric view to retrograde amnesia. Scientometrics, 51(1). Retrieved on October 26, 2018.

Singh, Shashi Prabha, & Parveen Babbar. (1998). Doctoral research in library and information science in India: Trends and issues. DESIDOC Journal of Library and Information Technology, 34(2), 170-180. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.14429/djlit.34.6019.

Shodhganga. (2018). Retrieved from http://shodhganga.inflibnet.ac.in/jspui/handle/10603.

UGC. (2018). University Grants Commission. Retrieved from https://www.ugc.ac.in.

Downloads

Published

11-11-2018

How to Cite

Sreeragi, R. G., & Mini Devi, B. (2018). Indian Doctoral Researches in Neuroscience: A Scientometric Study. Asian Journal of Information Science and Technology, 8(3), 104–109. https://doi.org/10.51983/ajist-2018.8.3.191