Students’ Perception, Using Channels and Factors Influencing Sharing of Knowledge in Learning Environment in Bangladesh
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.51983/ajist-2020.10.2.309Keywords:
Knowledge Sharing, Knowledge, Channel, Motivator, University Student, BangladeshAbstract
The premise of this study explores the students’ perception, using channels and the factors influencing sharing of knowledge in learning environment. A structured questionnaire was used for data collection from 261 undergraduate and graduate students in three private universities in Bangladesh. The results of the study found over two-thirds of students’ perception toward knowledge sharing (KS) are- it is not a plagiarism and helps to solve academic problems. Above 92% students share knowledge through each of three channels such as Internet, group discussion and social networks and over half of the students use these three channels everyday. More than four-fifths respondent students reported that reward and intention and nearly two-thirds and above stated that IT, perceived enjoyment and attitude influence their KS behavior. This study suggests that the university authority should facilitate access to enough knowledge resources, IT-enable learning environment and exercise teaching-learning methods that embed KS culture on the campus.
References
Alstyne, M. W. V. (2005). Create colleagues, not competitors: forethought knowledge sharing. Harvard Business Review, Sep.,1-5.
Ardichvili, A., Page, V., & Wentling, T. (2003). Motivation and barriers to participation in virtual knowledge-sharing communities of practice. Journal of Knowledge Management, 7(1), 64-77.
Bergeron, B. (2003). Essentials of knowledge management. Hoboken, New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
Bock, G. W., et al. (2005). Behavioral intention formation in knowledge sharing: examining the roles of extrinsic motivators, social-psychological forces, and organizational climate. MIS Quarterly, 29 (1), 87-111.
Brouwer, J., & Jansen, E. (2019). Beyond grades: developing knowledge sharing in learning communities as a graduate attribute. Higher Education Research & Development, 38(2), 219–234. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2018.1522619
Cheng, M. Y., Ho, J. S. Y., & Lau, P. M. (2008). Knowledge sharing in academic institutions: a study of Multimedia University Malaysia. Electronic Journal of Knowledge Management, 7(3), 313-324. Retrieved from http://www.ejkm com
Davenport, T. H., & Pruska, L. (1998). Working knowledge: how organizations manage what they know. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
Droege, S. B., & Hoobler, J. M. (2003). Employee turnover and tacit knowledge diffusion: a network perspective. Journal of Managerial Issues, 15(1), Spring, 50-64.
Han, B., & Anantatmula, V. (2007). Knowledge sharing in large IT organizations: a case study. VINE, 37(4), 421-439. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1108/03055720710838506
Haq, M. N., & Haque, M. (2018). Investigating the knowledge sharing among students in Pakistan. European Online Journal of Natural and Social Sciences, 7(1) Special Issue on New Trends in Business, Economics and Management, 31-39. Retrieved from http://www.european-science.com
Hussein, A., & Nassuora, A. (2011). Jordanian student’s attitudes and perceptions towards knowledge sharing in institutions of higher education. International Journal of Academic Research, 3(4), 401-405.
Islam, S., Nowrin, S., & Mostofa, S. M. (2017). Knowledge sharing pattern among the arts faculty students of Dhaka University. DESIDOC Journal of Library & Information Technology, 37(4), 243-248. Retrieved from DOI: 10.14429/djlit.37.4.9952
Kim, Y. B., & Lee, B. H. (1995). R & D project team climate and team performance in Korea. R & D Management, 25(2), 179-196.
Lee, J. (2018). The effects of knowledge sharing on individual creativity in higher education institutions: socio-technical view. Administrative Sciences, 8(21), 1-16. Retrieved from DOI :10.3390/admsci8020021
Mayer, R. C., Davis, J. H., & Schooman, F. D. (1995). An investigative model of organizational trust. The Academy of Management Review, 20(3), 709-734.
McEvily, B., Perrone, V., & Zaheer, A. (2003). Trust as an organizing principle. Organization Science, 14(1), 91-103.
Moghavvemi, S., et al. (2018). Effect of trust and perceived reciprocal benefit on students. knowledge sharing via facebook and academic performance. The Electronic Journal of Knowledge Management, 16(1), 23-35. Retrieved from http://www.ejkm.com
Majid, S., & Chitra, P. K. (2013). Role of knowledge sharing in the learning process. Literacy Information and Computer Education Journal (LICEJ), Special Issue, 2(1), 1292-1298.
Majid, S., & Wey, S. M. (2009). Perceptions and knowledge sharing practices of graduate students in Singapore. International Journal of Knowledge Management, 5(2), 21-32.
Rafique, G. M., & Anwar, M. A. (2017). Motivating knowledge sharing among undergraduate medical students of the University of Lahore, Pakistan. Journal of Information & Knowledge Management, 16(04). Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1142/S0219649217500411
Shin, C. H., Ramayah, T., & Jahani, S. (2008). Using Theory of Reasoned Action to explain the intention to share knowledge among academics. Retrieved from http://www.apera.nie.edu.sg/activities/…/APERA08_Day_3_Programme.pdf
Syed-Ikhsan, S. O. S, & Rowland, F. (2004). Knowledge management in a public organization: a study on the relationship between organizational elements and the performance of knowledge transfer. Journal of Knowledge Management, 8 (2), 95-111.
Usman, S. H. (2015). A survey on students’ preference in knowledge sharing tools to support learning in higher education. Journal of Advanced Management Science, 3(4), 350-353. Retrieved from http://www.joams.com/uploadfile/2014/0825/20140825105154513.pdf
Yaghi, K., et al. (2011). Knowledge sharing degree among the undergraduate students: a case study at applied science private university. International Journal of Academic Research, 3(1), 20-24.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2020 The Research Publication
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.